We’re going to need a bigger data centre

Ed Goring passed on an amazing set of statistics a few days ago in relation to our data centre project. The rise of Big Data is predicted to see data centre capacity to undergo massive growth over the next few years, from 0.79 zetabytes of data in 2009 to 35 zetabytes in 2020.

This really does underline the size of the opportunity in both real estate and IT terms as business moves fully into the Cloud over the next few years.

To misquote the late Roy Scheider in Jaws; we’re going to need a bigger data centre.

Infographic courtesy of www.csc.com

Cut price tendering

The University of Sheffield’s scheme for it’s new Engineering Faculty is in the news again, but this time not for the planning issues raised by the proposed listed building demolition – that issue still rumbling on with talk of legal action to prevent it.

Balfour Beatty have just been announced as the successful bidder for the main contract with a bid of £49.8m. That compares favourably from the Client’s point of view with the original budget estimate of £80m, and beat rival bids from BAM Construct, Bowmer & Kirkland, Interserve, Miller Construction and Sir Robert McAlpine.

At first sight it looks either like financial suicide for the contractor, or storing up a future contract dispute for the University. But Balfour Beatty are a smart firm who aren’t likely to have made a mistake in their offer, and the University of Sheffield is a savvy procurer who will readily throw out tenders that aren’t in their interests.

It’s common practice to submit below cost bids for a variety of reasons, but this is more than a priced to win tender that’s a couple of million below projected costs, and value engineering isn’t going to find tens of millions of savings. With main contractors final margins close to zero anyway, there’s clearly something else is going on here that we’re not aware of yet. It will be interesting to see what twiddles and twirls they have incorporated into their bid to bring it over the line.

Heseltine is right – London is sucking the life blood out of the rest of the UK

Lord Heseltine’s report: No stone unturned in the pursuit of growth from last year accurately drew a picture of the UK that is divided… London + The Rest.

What we need here isn’t more support for what has become quaintly known as “the regions”, we simply need HMG to focus less on their Westminster doorstep to reverse a century of centralisation.

London can fend for itself, and it should be left to do so. The people and business outside London aren’t less capable. If anything they have become more resourceful to survive in an environment where you can’t charge what you like simply for being there.

It’s not only bad for the UK, it’s actually bad for everything inside the M25 where people feel locked in and afraid that if they move out they won’t be able to afford to get back.

Today is budget day in the UK and Michael Heseltine has been doing the rounds of studios beforehand. His frank and refreshing appearance a short while ago on the BBC Today programme with Evan Davies might be a precursor of what is to follow later today. Let’s hope so.

Why property and construction matters on Budget Day

Wednesday is Budget Day. Chancellor George Osborne will take to the dispatch box to delight or disappoint, depending on what vested interests you happen to have this year. What does seem agreed upon among the financial experts is that it will be a moderate budget that doesn’t push the boat out politically. Bravado doesn’t seem to be the fashionable thing for politicians these days, so we should see a muted affair overall. That said, there are signs that there will be some long overdue good news for construction and property industries.

Construction is still only operating at around 55% of the level seen at the peak in 2007. That height saw construction costs, property values and land prices climb into the stratosphere to unsustainable heights up to three times the level of the late 1990’s, resulting in the worst property industry crash in modern times.

Since then, construction costs have dropped moderately, while property values remain in a delicate willing seller / willing buyer balance, with neither party having much of an upper hand, either because of lack of funding on the buyers’ part, or high borrowings on the sellers’.

Land prices are dropping even faster, back to the levels seen around ten years ago in some places as vendors gradually realise that they have sat on their nest egg for so long that it has gone off.

So far, so bad. What we do have on the up side is a sizeable industry that accounts for around a tenth of the UK economy, which employs over two million workers in more than 300,000 businesses of all shapes and sizes.

While we’ve seen decline in employment and volume since 2008 it remains almost unique, in that it is still fully formed with the capacity to literally go to work tomorrow, without no delays, no infrastructure investment and no additional upskilling. All construction needs is some orders and we can get to work on implementing those planning consents the very next day.

What does that mean for the budget? There are various calls to action, including from John Cridland, the Director General of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) who says that spending £1.25bn on affordable housing would generate £18bn for wider economy and create another 75,000 jobs; “To boost the construction sector, we are calling for 50,000 new affordable homes to be built, incentives for refurbishing empty homes and the housing guarantee scheme to be extended to all types of housing.”.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders is also looking at housebuilding in terms of incentives by urging the chancellor to extend NewBuy beyond 2015, and address the anomaly under which the scheme allows access to home-ownership with a 5% deposit but means that a buyer is likely to be taxed because the purchase is liable for stamp duty.

Two weeks ago we might have had a foretaste of what’s in store when Michael Gove, the education minister announced £4bn for spending on refurbishing schools through local authorities. This recognised that the systems are already in place if finance is provided.

Let’s be crystal clear though – construction isn’t a special case in need of additional support. It makes sense to build. Not only for those employed directly and indirectly on sites, in offices, and on factory floors, but for the wider economy. Construction is particularly good at achieving re-spend of the money invested. In other words, money spent on builders, architects, engineers, plant and machine hire, etc goes quickly back into the local economy to be re-spent again, and again, and again. It stays local. Making lots of smaller pockets of cash start spinning tomorrow is better for communities, cities and UK PLC than waiting decades for more valuable infrastructure projects like HS2 to happen.

We should hope that Mr Osborne aims his target at the less glamorous end of the construction industry with a serious, but achievable investment that will reap rewards now.

Demolishing Jessop’s

Two days ago, Sheffield City Council voted to confirm an extraordinary decision to demolish a Grade 2 listed building – the remains of the 1902 portion of the Jessop Hospital for Women in Sheffield. The reason for the vote was that in December they took the same decision but had failed to consult with the requisite external bodies outlined on the campaign against demolition website.

This saga has rumbled on for some time. At the early stages it seemed that the planning department were extremely critical of many aspects of the scheme by RMJM Architects. Make no mistake, RMJM are great architects and they already have a track record in Sheffield with the luscious Information Commons building just over the road from the Jessop’s site. However, the demolition proposal remained, and over time the concerns expressed by Sheffield planners seem to have been successfully nullified or worn down by the applicant and their team.

That has made Sheffield people hopping mad! There is a petition with over two and a half thousand names calling for the Secretary of State for Communities to call in the decision because “Sheffield City Council has failed to properly enforce planning law and its own policy.” Time will tell if the council has failed to act correctly. If they have failed, and then reconfirmed their original decision, the consequences will make fascinating spectating.

In the meantime it sends out a confused message to developers, architects, planners, investors and citizens. Is the planning department acting correctly? Can they be relied on to follow procedure? Is the planning process honest and transparent in Sheffield?  Is Sheffield somewhere to do business? Is there some hidden political agenda going on behind the scenes?

Let’s be clear here. Preserving buildings just because they are old is not a good enough reason for retention, but this is a fine building with an extensive local heritage and functional context. It is an uncommon example of high quality neo-gothic Edwardian architecture in the city and it’s status is rightly reflected in its Grade 2 English Heritage listing.

Incorporation of the existing structure into this otherwise excellent project should be considered as a de-minimis requirement in this instance. It’s not a tough architectural call, the space impact seems to be minimal or non existent, and it would be an excellent PR move by the University, showing that they are an integral part of Sheffield’s community and not too big for their boots.

A university does need space to breath and spaces that inspire. But, we must also remember that communities need their roots. There can be few greater anchors than the place where most of those people were born, and it can’t be asking too much to retain one small corner for those feelings of place to be kept alive.

University of Sheffield project page  ¦  Architects Journal article  ¦  www.jessophospital.org.uk   ¦  Facebook page  ¦  Sheffield Star article